Functional Foods

Functional foods are a new trend emerging in response to the public’s increasing health consciousness. The food industry continues to create products with ‘added health benefits’ and it seems as if there is a new product on the shelf every week. It can be difficult keep up. Let’s explore functional foods and if you should consider adding them to your diet.

What is a Functional Food?

What is a functional food? Now that, is a good question. There is no singular, universal definition for functional foods. However, the general idea, is a food with an added health function, that is superior to a ‘general’ food. This definition is vague; hence it is easier to understand functional foods in the context of examples.

Functional foods can be naturally high in a particular nutrient, giving it an added health benefit. For example, broccoli might be considered a functional food because it is high in sulphoraphane, compared to ‘general’ green vegetables. Sulphoraphane has an antioxidant role in our bodies, hence, this is the added health benefit.

Similarly, oats are very high in a special fibre type called, B-glucans. As far as ‘general’ grains go, oats are the only ones that contain this fibre. B-glucans have cholesterol lowering properties, which we can define as the ‘added health benefit’. Hence, oats are a functional food.

Since we all want to be fit and healthy, these extra healthy foods are especially attractive. And the food industry knows this. So, in order to get their share of the functional food market, they have created their own.

Foods can be functional if the manufacturer has added nutrients that are not originally present in that food. Again, I know that is confusing, so let’s look at more examples.

Margarine isn’t a functional food, however if a manufacturer was to add plant sterols to their product, it is now a functional food. Plant sterols are cholesterol lowering, and therefore offer an added health benefit. Now, the manufacturer can charge more for this product because it is superior to the regular margarine.

Putting Functional Food in Perspective

An incentive for food companies to make their products healthier is a good thing, and helps to achieve an overall healthier food supply. However, the introduction of functional foods to our food system hasn’t been all smooth sailing.

It is unfortunate that even innately unhealthy foods, can be made functional. While making an unhealthy food functional makes it healthier, it doesn’t make it healthy. For example, a chocolate manufacturer might like to add fibre to its product. What we end up with is chocolate (unhealthy) with a bit of fibre in in (still unhealthy). Adding a few grams of any healthy nutrient doesn’t all of a sudden create a healthy food. Good nutrients don’t cancel out the bad. Just because your milkshake has extra protein, doesn’t mean milkshakes are healthy. People believe that by consuming functional versions of unhealthy foods, that it is okay to continue to make unhealthy choices. Unfortunately, it just doesn’t work like that.

The Cost Factor

Since functional foods are generally more expensive, they contribute to the misbelief that eating healthy is expensive. Yes, functional ice-cream may be more expensive than regular less healthy ice-cream. But you do not need to eat functional ice-cream in order to be healthy. A healthy diet can be maintained on a budget, without the use of functional foods.

Blurring the Lines

Functional foods challenge the five food groups that currently underpin the dietetic message. Functional foods may not necessarily fit neatly into the fruit, vegetable/legumes, meat/poultry/fish/egg/alternatives, dairy and grain divisions. For example, if you take a grain, and you theoretically add some protein, a bit of zinc, iron and magnesium, that grain, can technically be classified as a meat alternative. Hence, fitting into both groups.

The Australian Dietary Guidelines are the messages that underpin the way Australian eat and the way dietitians educate the public. They are based on this food grouping system. It therefore does not cater to those who choose to include functional foods in their diet. Hence, we need to modify our messages, to become relevant to our current food supply, in which functional foods are prominent.

The Low Sugar Debate

There is significant debate on the classification of low sugar/fat products as functional foods. The controversy lies in the way we define functional foods (which is not all that clear, giving rise to debate). If the definition of functional foods is that nutrients are added for a health benefit, the removal of nutrients for health purposes, does not constitute a functional food. On the other hand, the removal of sugar/fat has an ‘added’ health benefit compared to the full sugar/fat product in terms of reducing obesity and its co-morbidities. Hence, some might argue such products fit this part of the definition and therefore are functional. The debate continues, and I’ll leave to you to decide on which side you sit.

When to use Functional Foods

For the generally healthy individual, functional foods are an unnecessary, expensive addition to the diet. They won’t harm you (expect for maybe financially) and can become part of a healthy diet. However, they do not need to be included in order to achieve health.

Functional foods are most useful in special populations, for whom ‘general’ foods are not enough to meet nutrient requirements easily. For example, the frail elderly who need extra protein and energy. By making functional foods by adding skim milk powder to regular mashed potato the individual can get more protein and energy, in fewer mouthfuls.

As you can see, functional foods do have a place without our food system and offer a lot of opportunity and benefits. They do, however, need to be considered on a case-by-case basis before they are recommended and introduced to the diet.

Share this post: