There is surprising amount of people following an all meat diet. Nothing else. All meat, all the time.
I first heard of this meat only diet on a TV show, an entire family that only ate meat. At the time, I thought they were an anomaly, kind of like those people that like to eat glass or other equally unpalatable objects.
Apparently, I was wrong.
With the popularity of the ketogenic diet on the rise, it seems many are willing to take the next step and go all meat – otherwise known as zero carb – could this be the next big dietary trend?
The Zero Carb support group I joined on Facebook has close to 6,500 members, another public forum has nearly 13,000 follower and YouTube videos on the topic are in the 100s of thousands. One group even have their very own carnivore clothing apparel. The need for people to advertise their dietary choices via clothing and stickers is equal as perplexing as an all meat diet. Perhaps some ‘well balanced diet’ T-shirts are in order.
The question is what kind of health consequences does a zero carb diet have?
It appears there is one scientific study on zero carb. One study, with two guys, from 1930.
These two guys ate nothing but meat for 12 months. The result? Nothing really, no negative results were reported and both seemed to be in a similar condition to when they started. (1)
Which raises some interesting questions. Is fiber essential? Are plants necessary to achieve optimal vitamin and mineral requirements?
Meet the Meat Diet
There are varying degrees to which one can follow a zero-carb diet.
The ‘eat meat, drink water’ variation is just straight up steak and water. This is the strict zero carb diet, seafood, poultry, meat and eggs, salt and animal fats for cooking may also be included.
Others are slightly more lenient and include cheeses, full fat dairy and plant oils. Spices and mustards may also be allowed but discouraged somewhat.
Anything else is off limits – this includes sugar free sweeteners and protein powders.
There is no optimal protein to fat ratio or calorie counting, you just eat until you are full.
A sample Meal plan – taken from a zero carb blog – looks something like this:
Breakfast: 4 eggs + 8 pieces of bacon
Snack: hard boiled eggs or meat and cheese
Lunch: ½ rotisserie chicken (not flavoured)
Dinner: Grilled steak
Or from a zero carb veteran, who says she eats the same thing every day
Breakfast: 500g ground beef
Dinner: 500g steak
What is the rational for a Zero Carb diet?
Advocates for zero carb claim that many of our ancestors such as the Inuit and Maasi, existed solely on animal products. While these indigenous communities do eat a predominantly meat based diet, they also eat plants when they are available. Populations subsisting on a meat centric diet in the past would have been the minority. Our ancestors would have eaten vastly different diets depending on the region they resided. Much like todays regional cuisine. (2-6) Additionally, it is not known how healthy these populations actually were.
The zero carb mantra is ‘meat heals’, what it heals is less clear, some of the claimed health benefits include:
• Mental clarity
• Reduced food cravings
• Decreased triglycerides and increased HDL
• Stabilising blood glucose
• Reduced digestive issues
• Weight loss
Aside from anecdotal (personal) reports, there is no evidence to support any of these claims.
Weight loss and better health are frequently reported by followers. Possibly explained by the satiating effects of protein and fat, leading to an overall reduction in calorie intake. Many health benefits are associated with weight loss, the result could be the remission of some chronic disease – this can also be achieved by following other dietary patterns.
What about poop?
How does a zero carb, zero fibre diet affect digestive health and the gut microbiome (bacteria in the gut)?
Zero Carber’s claim in the absence of carbohydrates, fibre is unnecessary.
For long term management followers of the diet advise to increase fat consumption if constipated and conversely increase lean meats if diarrhea is a problem.
For the most part bowel movements appear not to be an issue, it seems followers are able to maintain this way of eating without severe constipation.
So how essential is fiber?
While there are numerous studies looking at potential health benefits of fiber, there are very few looking at the effects of very low or zero fiber diets. Likely due to the obscurity of a zero fibre diet.
The benefits of fibre for digestive health are well documented and I have written about this elsewhere.
We know that gut bacteria thrive on fibre, and a healthy microbiome can potentially lead to health benefits in other parts of the body. Diet can affect the diversity of gut bacteria. What changes would occur and the health outcomes associated with long term absence of fibre is unknown. (7, 8)
In one small study 10 healthy participants were put on a low residue (a form of very low fibre) diet for 7 days. They found that although participants pooped 70% less, the bacterial composition of their poop did not appear to be affected. However, as this was such a short time frame, the results do not predict long term effects.(9)
Another study of 63 participants, suffering from constipation, went on a no fiber diet for 2 weeks. After this the participants choose to remain no fiber, increase to low fiber or opt to go back to a high fiber diet. After 6 months 41 participants choose to remain on a no fiber diet and had a statistically significant reduction in symptoms of constipation, bleeding, bloating, straining and pain. The low and high fiber groups did not. This study, had no control group and had no placebo (fake) comparison. It is also possible these symptoms would be reduced on a low FODMAP diet. (10)
Let’s go back to the rational that our ancestors survived on a diet similar to the Inuit populations.
It appears the Inuit value regular bowl habits, and perhaps even feared constipation. One of their most powerful gods is aptly named Fart Man (Matshishkapeu in Inuit). Legend has it that fart man is able to inflict a deadly case of constipation on those that do not follow his wishes. He also communicates through farts, when people fart in certain formal situations the fart must be translated. Although only a select few are versed in fart translation. (11) Not entirely relevant to Inuit gut health – but intriguing none the less!
The gut microbiome of a remote Inuit community was compared to that of people living in a nearby city. Surprisingly only subtle differences were found between the two. When the microbiome of other hunter gathers communities, with high fiber diets were studied, significantly greater diversity in gut flora was found. (12)
In a nutshell: The outcome of an all meat diet on digestive health is not understood. Aside from anecdotal accounts there is a distinct lack of evidence in this area. It would not be advisable to completely eliminate fibre from the diet as long-term effects are unknown.
What About Vitamins and Minerals?
Can you get all the vitamins and minerals you need from meat alone?
Zero carb follower argue that the recommended intakes for vitamins and minerals are not applicable when eating this way. There are no studies proving this is the case This is potentially dangerous advice, especially for women of childbearing age.
Vitamin C intake is a major concern. The types of meats eaten in the traditional Inuit diet are quite high in vitamin C, explaining the absence of deficiency. These meats are rare (roast narwhal anyone?) and not typically consumed by the rest of the population. A minimum intake of 10mg per day is recommended to prevent scurvy (deficiency). If consuming organ meats, you may get this amount of vitamin C but it is unlikely you would reach the recommended daily intake.(13, 14)
Unless dairy is included in the diet calcium would also be a concern, if you ate 1kg of lean beef you would get roughly 45mg of calcium, which is only a fraction of the recommended 1000mg per day. Folate is another, this is only present in significant amounts in organ meats such as liver.
The diet would also be depleted of many healthful compounds such as polyphenols and antioxidants – the effect of this low intake is undetermined.
For other vitamins and mineral, providing organ meats were also being consumed, they would unlikely to be an issue. (15)
In a nutshell: It would be difficult to consume optimal amounts of vitamins and minerals eating only muscle meats. Dairy and organ meat may provide extra nutrients. Vitamin C levels probably do not meet RDI, however survey is unlikely. Folate intake is definitely a concern, deficiency may occur.
Is a Zero Carb Diet Safe?
This is precisely the issue with zero carb, the long-term health effects are largely unknown.
There are many anecdotal accounts of people following zero carb for years, with no adverse health effects. Many followers report to be in optimal health. Perhaps it works for some, however not recommended for majority people.
There is also potentially damaging and questionable health advice is given in these circles. Due to the lack of evidence most of the advice is based on opinion.
Two big red flags.
No need to exercise: Some groups advise not to exercise even though exercise has clear health benefits.
Children and zero carb: The most concerning is children are following this diet, the effects on physical and mental growth and development are unknown. Therefore, this diet is most certainly not suitable for children.
Hopefully we see some research on zero carb in the not too distant future, especially the effects on digestive health and the microbiome.
In the meantime, I will remain fascinated by the enigma that is zero carb.
1. McClellan WS, Du Bois EF. Clinical calorimetry XLV. Prolonged meat diets with a study of kidney function and ketosis. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1930;87(3):651-68.
2. Bussmann RW, Gilbreath GG, Solio J, Lutura M, Lutuluo R, Kunguru K, et al. Plant use of the Maasai of Sekenani Valley, Maasai Mara, Kenya. Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine. 2006;2(1):22.
3. Kuhnleini HV, Soueida R. Use and nutrient composition of traditional Baffin Inuit foods. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 1992;5(2):112-26.
4. Johns T. Phytochemicals as evolutionary mediators of human nutritional physiology. International Journal of Pharmacognosy. 1996;34(5):327-34.
5. Johns T, Mahunnah R, Sanaya P, Chapman L, Ticktin T. Saponins and phenolic content in plant dietary additives of a traditional subsistence community, the Batemi of Ngorongoro District, Tanzania. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 1999;66(1):1-10.
6. Nestle M. Animal v. plant foods in human diets and health: is the historical record unequivocal? Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 1999;58(2):211-8.
7. Flint HJ. The impact of nutrition on the human microbiome. Nutrition reviews. 2012;70(s1).
8. David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, Gootenberg DB, Button JE, Wolfe BE, et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2014;505(7484):559-63.
9. Bornside GH, Cohn Jr I. Stability of normal human fecal flora during a chemically defined, low residue liquid diet. Annals of surgery. 1975;181(1):58.
10. Ho K-S, Tan CYM, Daud MAM, Seow-Choen F. Stopping or reducing dietary fiber intake reduces constipation and its associated symptoms. World Journal of Gastroenterology: WJG. 2012;18(33):4593.
11. Armitage P. Religious ideology among the Innu of eastern Quebec and Labrador. Religiologiques. 1992;6(4):63-110.
12. Girard C, Tromas N, Amyot M, Shapiro BJ. Gut Microbiome of the Canadian Arctic Inuit. mSphere. 2017;2(1):e00297-16.
13. Fediuk K, Hidiroglou N, Madère R, Kuhnlein HV. Vitamin C in Inuit traditional food and women’s diets. Journal of food Composition and Analysis. 2002;15(3):221-35.
14. KIZLAITIS L, Steinfeld M, Siedler A. Nutrient Content of Variety Meats. Journal of Food Science. 1962;27(5):459-62.
15. Williams P. Nutritional composition of red meat. Nutrition & Dietetics. 2007;64(s4).